lyriic

Poem analysesRobert Graves

Goliath and David analysis

Goliath and DavidRobert Graves1916

Graves turns the biblical victory into a grim First World War parable; this analysis follows its reversal and war imagery.

Full text from The Muse in Arms — full poem. Public domain in the US (First published in 1916, before the US public-domain cutoff.).

Summary

Graves retells David and Goliath but announces that the familiar historian “Had not the heart to tell it right.”[2]

David’s sling and staff fail against shield and steel; Goliath survives and stands over the dead boy.[1]

Meaning and interpretation

The reversal challenges the comforting underdog myth: courage cannot cancel superior material force in modern combat.[2]

The parenthesis makes the failure theological as well as military, while the dedication turns the rewritten legend into a memorial.[3]

Themes

  • Failure of heroic myth

    The expected miracle is replaced by a blunt account of defeat.

  • Unequal power

    Pebble and wood are opposed to shield, armor, and steel.[2]

  • Faith and divine silence

    David trusts that God will save him, but the poem depicts no intervention.

  • Grief and remembrance

    The dedication identifies the poem with David Cuthbert Thomas, killed at Fricourt in March 1916.[3]

Form and meter

The poem has a twelve-line opening stanza and a thirty-four-line battle stanza, mostly organized in rhyming couplets.[2]

The brisk couplets accommodate narrative action, while interruptions such as “Then ... but” fracture the traditional tale at the moment of reversal.

Literary devices

  • Biblical inversion

    The reversed title and altered outcome keep the biblical story present while denying its familiar moral.

  • Onomatopoeia

    Metallic repetition makes the failed attack audible.

  • Simile

    The lively simile emphasizes the pebble’s smallness against the giant’s equipment.

Historical context

The poem is dedicated “For D. C. T., killed at Fricourt, March 1916”; the GMU notes identify David Cuthbert Thomas as Graves’s friend and fellow Royal Welch Fusilier.[3]

The spike-helmeted giant brings the biblical encounter into the First World War and its German military imagery.[1]

What critics say

  • Graves has chosen to format this piece with a rhyme scheme of aabbccdd

  • Like Wilfred Owen’s ‘Parable of the Old Man and the Young’ (1918), it generalizes the death of Thomas to illustrate a larger truth

Common questions

What is the poem’s meaning?
It reverses the biblical victory to show how courage and faith can fail against overwhelming force.
What are its themes?
Heroic myth, unequal power, divine silence, war, grief, and remembrance.
What form does it use?
A two-stanza narrative built mainly from rhyming couplets, with varied meter and abrupt sound effects.

References