Poem analysesRobert Graves
Goliath and David analysis
Goliath and DavidRobert Graves1916
Graves turns the biblical victory into a grim First World War parable; this analysis follows its reversal and war imagery.
Full text from The Muse in Arms — full poem. Public domain in the US (First published in 1916, before the US public-domain cutoff.).
Summary
Meaning and interpretation
Themes
Failure of heroic myth
The expected miracle is replaced by a blunt account of defeat.
Unequal power
Pebble and wood are opposed to shield, armor, and steel.[2]
Faith and divine silence
David trusts that God will save him, but the poem depicts no intervention.
Grief and remembrance
The dedication identifies the poem with David Cuthbert Thomas, killed at Fricourt in March 1916.[3]
Form and meter
The poem has a twelve-line opening stanza and a thirty-four-line battle stanza, mostly organized in rhyming couplets.[2]
The brisk couplets accommodate narrative action, while interruptions such as “Then ... but” fracture the traditional tale at the moment of reversal.
Literary devices
Biblical inversion
The reversed title and altered outcome keep the biblical story present while denying its familiar moral.
Onomatopoeia
Metallic repetition makes the failed attack audible.
Simile
The lively simile emphasizes the pebble’s smallness against the giant’s equipment.
Historical context
What critics say
“Graves has chosen to format this piece with a rhyme scheme of aabbccdd”
“Like Wilfred Owen’s ‘Parable of the Old Man and the Young’ (1918), it generalizes the death of Thomas to illustrate a larger truth”
Common questions
- What is the poem’s meaning?
- It reverses the biblical victory to show how courage and faith can fail against overwhelming force.
- What are its themes?
- Heroic myth, unequal power, divine silence, war, grief, and remembrance.
- What form does it use?
- A two-stanza narrative built mainly from rhyming couplets, with varied meter and abrupt sound effects.